The military media of Iran has strongly responded to Israel’s assertion that one of its prominent wartime representatives is a product of artificial intelligence, transforming the claim into a moment of widespread ridicule and psychological maneuvering.
“Incredible! After 40 days of conflict, the Israeli army is now shamefully asserting that Colonel Ebrahim Zolfaghari is an AI creation. Clearly, they are threatened by his rising fame!” stated Iran Military Media in a post featuring a video reply.
A VIRAL REBUTTAL — WITH A WINK
In the video, Colonel Ebrahim Zolfaghari appears to embrace the allegation with irony. He humorously affirms the AI narrative, joking about having six fingers, then smiles while lifting a coffee cup. The footage transitions into stylized images, turning to black-and-white with pixelated sunglasses — a lighthearted jab that has rapidly circulated on social media.
This display highlights how both factions are increasingly merging propaganda with internet culture to influence public perceptions.
ISRAEL’S CLAIM: ‘HE SEEMS ARTIFICIAL’
The dispute ignited when the Israel Defense Forces suggested that Zolfaghari might not be a real person. In a post on their Farsi-language account, Israeli representatives questioned if the spokesperson had ever been seen beyond controlled broadcasts.
“If you have spotted him in an interview or in the field, let us know. If not, assist us in proving that he is a product of artificial intelligence,” the post stated.
The message extended further, casting doubt on Iran’s integrity: Are “fictional characters” being utilized to engage with the public?
THE FACE OF IRAN’S MESSAGING WAR
Zolfaghari has become a key figure in Iran’s wartime communication efforts, acting as a spokesperson for the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters.
Clad in military attire, he delivers sharp messages targeted at both Israel and the United States, frequently infused with taunts aimed at Donald Trump.
In one widely shared clip, he ridiculed Trump’s dependence on social media: “The outcome of war cannot be dictated by tweets; it is determined on the battlefield.”
In another instance, he mocked the rhetoric of the U.S. president with a straightforward remark:
“Hey, Trump, you are fired. You are familiar with this phrase.”
His demeanor — composed, theatrical, and often provocative — has drawn parallels to Iraq’s notorious wartime spokesperson Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf, commonly referred to as “Comical Ali.”
REAL OR AI? THE EVIDENCE DEBATE
The speculation surrounding Zolfaghari’s identity reflects a broader uncertainty influenced by contemporary information warfare. His online presence seems primarily linked to the ongoing conflict, and his delivery — controlled expressions, deliberate gestures — has prompted some viewers to question whether he is AI-generated.
However, others highlight details indicating otherwise: consistent military insignia, natural language patterns, and archived footage that may predate the conflict.
Cybersecurity experts suggest that the debate itself may be part of the strategy.
By questioning his existence, Israel might be attempting to provoke a live appearance or reveal operational details. Meanwhile, Iran seems to be leveraging the controversy to enhance his visibility.
NARRATIVE BECOMES THE NEW BATTLEFIELD
Currently, whether Zolfaghari is a real person or merely a highly refined spokesperson may be less significant than the impact he is making. Iran is embracing the controversy, portraying it as evidence of influence. Conversely, Israel is sowing doubt to undermine his credibility.
A new battleground has emerged between them — one where memes, mockery, and machine learning serve as potent as missiles.
In this clash, even the question — is he real? — has become an integral part of the strategy.