The Supreme Court strongly criticized the West Bengal government for the prolonged confinement of judicial officers in Malda, labeling it a premeditated effort to disrupt the electoral process and undermine officials’ morale. Protests against voter deletions led to seven judicial officers, including three women officials participating in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, being held inside the Block Development Officer’s office. The court mandated the deployment of central armed forces to ensure their safety.
Key statements from the Supreme Court included condemning the incident as an intentional move to intimidate judicial officers and impede the objection adjudication process. The court reprimanded the West Bengal government for neglecting its duty and failing to ensure the officers’ safe evacuation, highlighting the absence of the Collector until late at night. The bench emphasized that no one should be allowed to unlawfully intimidate judicial officers and instill fear, cautioning that such activities could constitute criminal contempt. Criticism was also directed at the state administration for what was termed a severe dereliction of duty.
The Chief Justice expressed disappointment at the politicization of the situation in West Bengal, labeling it as a highly polarized state where political rhetoric dominates. The court urged all leaders to unite in condemning the incident and emphasized its commitment to safeguarding the officers, stating that their directives are to be regarded as court orders.